© 2026 Optics and Photonics at Nottingham
43%
56.3%
8.8%
£5m+
Data for 2020-2025 from SciVal
Qiu, Dewei; Cao, Chuanliang; Prasopthum, Aruna; Sun, Zhenchang; Zhang, Shan; Yang, Hanwen; Xu, Zhiyong; Tao, Jun; Ai, Fanrong; Yang, Jing
Elucidating osseointegration in vivo in 3D printed scaffolds eliciting different foreign body responses Journal Article
In: Mater. Today Bio, vol. 22, no. 100771, pp. 100771, 2023.
Abstract | Tags: 3D printing, biomaterials, bone, Foreign body response, Osseointegration, Tissue engineering
@article{Qiu2023-np,
title = {Elucidating osseointegration in vivo in 3D printed scaffolds
eliciting different foreign body responses},
author = {Dewei Qiu and Chuanliang Cao and Aruna Prasopthum and Zhenchang Sun and Shan Zhang and Hanwen Yang and Zhiyong Xu and Jun Tao and Fanrong Ai and Jing Yang},
year = {2023},
date = {2023-10-01},
journal = {Mater. Today Bio},
volume = {22},
number = {100771},
pages = {100771},
publisher = {Elsevier BV},
abstract = {Osseointegration between biomaterial and bone is critical for
the clinical success of many orthopaedic and dental implants.
However, the mechanisms of in vivo interfacial bonding formation
and the role of immune cells in this process remain unclear. In
this study, we investigated the bone-scaffold material
interfaces in two different 3D printed porous scaffolds
(polymer/hydroxyapatite and sintered hydroxyapatite) that
elicited different levels of foreign body response (FBR). The
polymer/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds elicited more
intensive FBR, which was evidenced by more FBR components, such
as macrophages/foreign body giant cells and fibrous tissue,
surrounding the material surface. Sintered hydroxyapatite
scaffolds showed less intensive FBR compared to the composite
scaffolds. The interfacial bonding appeared to form via new bone
first forming within the pores of the scaffolds followed by
growing towards strut surfaces. In contrast, it was previously
thought that bone regeneration starts at biomaterial surfaces
via osteogenic stem/progenitor cells first attaching to them.
The material-bone interface of the less immunogenic
hydroxyapatite scaffolds was heterogenous across all samples,
evidenced by the coexistence of osseointegration and FBR
components. The presence of FBR components appeared to inhibit
osseointegration. Where FBR components were present there was no
osseointegration. Our results offer new insight on the in vivo
formation of bone-material interface, which highlights the
importance of minimizing FBR to facilitate osseointegration for
the development of better orthopaedic and dental biomaterials.},
keywords = {3D printing, biomaterials, bone, Foreign body response, Osseointegration, Tissue engineering},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
A part of the University of Nottingham
© 2026 Optics and Photonics at Nottingham. Created for free using WordPress and Kubio