© 2026 Optics and Photonics at Nottingham
43%
56.3%
8.8%
£5m+
Data for 2020-2025 from SciVal
Crooks, Colin J; West, Joe; Fogarty, Andrew; Morling, Joanne R; Grainge, Matthew J; Gonem, Sherif; Simmonds, Mark; Race, Andrea; Juurlink, Irene; Briggs, Steve; Cruickshank, Simon; Hammond-Pears, Susan; Card, Timothy R
Predicting need for escalation of care or death from repeated daily clinical observations and laboratory results in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 Journal Article
In: Am. J. Epidemiol., vol. 191, no. 11, pp. 1944–1953, 2022.
Abstract | Tags: coronavirus disease 2019, COVID-19, critical care, mortality, SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, survival analysis
@article{Crooks2022-ng,
title = {Predicting need for escalation of care or death from repeated
daily clinical observations and laboratory results in patients
with severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2},
author = {Colin J Crooks and Joe West and Andrew Fogarty and Joanne R Morling and Matthew J Grainge and Sherif Gonem and Mark Simmonds and Andrea Race and Irene Juurlink and Steve Briggs and Simon Cruickshank and Susan Hammond-Pears and Timothy R Card},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-10-01},
journal = {Am. J. Epidemiol.},
volume = {191},
number = {11},
pages = {1944\textendash1953},
publisher = {Oxford University Press (OUP)},
abstract = {We compared the performance of prognostic tools for severe acute
respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) using parameters
fitted either at the time of hospital admission or across all
time points of an admission. This cohort study used clinical
data to model the dynamic change in prognosis of SARS-CoV-2 at a
single hospital center in the United Kingdom, including all
patients admitted from February 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020,
and then followed up for 60 days for intensive care unit (ICU)
admission, death, or discharge from the hospital. We
incorporated clinical observations and blood tests into 2
time-varying Cox proportional hazards models predicting daily
24- to 48-hour risk of admission to the ICU for those eligible
for escalation of care or death for those ineligible for
escalation. In developing the model, 491 patients were eligible
for ICU escalation and 769 were ineligible for escalation. Our
model had good discrimination of daily risk of ICU admission in the validation cohort (n = 1,141; C statistic: C = 0.91, 95%
confidence interval: 0.89, 0.94) and our score performed better
than other scores (National Early Warning Score 2, International
Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection Comprehensive
Clinical Characterisation Collaboration score) calculated using
only parameters measured on admission, but it overestimated the risk of escalation (calibration slope = 0.7). A bespoke daily
SARS-CoV-2 escalation risk prediction score can predict the need
for clinical escalation better than a generic early warning
score or a single estimation of risk calculated at admission.},
keywords = {coronavirus disease 2019, COVID-19, critical care, mortality, SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, survival analysis},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
A part of the University of Nottingham
© 2026 Optics and Photonics at Nottingham. Created for free using WordPress and Kubio